I’m partial to vulgar imagery…more tits, more contorted poses, better faster more! That said, a certain intellect is what brings just plain sex into the realm of high fashion. Purple magazine, known for its scantily clad covers and editorials, may have lost that element in this issue. Let’s see what threads of subtlety are at play these two edits:
1. SEX SWING (Below):
Nothing hints at sultry quite like a rope-and-pulley system designed to align your private parts! Though, I must compliment the hair people on cut and color.

2. GIRL-ON-GIRL ACTION (Below):
Who knew grabbing no breasts whatsoever could be so hot?

3. PAGING KARL LAGERFELD’S BITCH…(Below):
Oh, Baptiste. No paycheck is big enough to explain this Hefner-meets-April-centerfold shot.

4. BALL HANDLER OR VERY SKILLED PHOTOSHOPPER PRESENT ON SET (Below Left, Right):
Anytime I look at a model and wonder if a specific stylist was at the shoot with the sole job of situating his peen/its surroundings, I try to stop looking. Okay, that’s a lie. I keep looking. A lot! But am still very confused.


I dunno, personally I would’ve liked the second shot above WITH a little visible anatomy. Why not, when we’re obviously 99.999999% there already…if you’re going to get all edgy with it, show us the goods!
images: models.com



ahahaha you’re too funny…yeah, I wonder what the stylist does on those nudey shoots. I’ve gotten used to those vulgar editorials but when it’s EXTREME like, full blown sex and penises everywhere, I have to look away!
I really feel that what purple does best is their blog. the magazine seems like too much work went in for what comes out. y’know?
http://www.purple-diary.com/
by their blog, I mean purple diary – in case there’s another.
very homotography..
where is it for 15 dollars?????????!